字體大小: 字級放大   字級縮小   預設字形  

詳目顯示

以作者查詢圖書館館藏以作者&題名查詢臺灣博碩士以作者查詢全國書目
研究生中文姓名:周彥君
研究生英文姓名:Yen-Chun Chou
中文論文名稱:教科書之字母拼讀教學内容評析:探討教科書之內容設計是否符合教師之觀點
英文論文名稱:Textbook Phonics: Does it Match Teachers’ Perspectives on Phonics Instruction?
指導教授姓名:鄭錦桂
學位類別:碩士
校院名稱:臺北市立教育大學
系所名稱:英語教學系碩士班
論文出版年:101
畢業學年度:100
語文別:英文
論文頁數:191
中文關鍵詞:字母拼讀教學內容教科書設計教師觀點
英文關鍵字:Phonics teaching contentsTextbook designTeachers’ perspectives
相關次數:
  • 推薦推薦:0
  • 點閱點閱:511
  • 評分評分:系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔系統版面圖檔
  • 下載下載:43
  • 收藏收藏:0
本研究旨在探究國小英語教師對於字母拼讀教學之認知,以及對國小英語教科書中字母拼讀教學內容的看法,進而將結果加以比較、對比及歸納,以了解對國小英語教師而言,目前國小英語教科書字母拼讀教學的設計,是否符合他們的教學需求。
  本研究以問卷調查法為主,輔以個別訪談的方式。研究對象為台北市國小英語教師,且符合該校三到六年級需使用同一版本英語教科書之條件。問卷填答者共一百七十四位,再從中挑選持不同意見之六位自願受訪者,進行後續個別訪談。
研究結果顯示,對字母拼讀教學之認知而言,
1.國小英語教師普遍了解字母拼讀法主要是用以教導字音間的關係。同時亦能協助學生拼字、認字、發音、閱讀及記誦單字的能力。
2.國小英語教師也普遍了解雖然字母拼讀法不能完全取代KK音標,在國小階段仍須以字母拼讀教學為主。但多數國小英語教師仍將字母拼讀教學與語音學的概念混淆。
3.國小英語教師對於該如何教字母拼讀之認知普遍符合相關文獻中對字母拼讀教學順序的建議。
4.國小英語教師認為應同時使用傳統及建構式的字母拼讀教學法。
5.大多數國小英語教師認為自己有充足的字母拼讀教學相關知識,但有些教師仍希望多補充字母拼讀教學方法以及音韻覺識的相關知識。
對國小英語教科書中字母拼讀法教學內容編排設計而言,
1.國小老師普遍認為在英語教科書中,字母拼讀教學內容有適當的編排順序,也提供複習字母的單元。另外也提供適合的字音關係代表單字、聲頭及韻母的教學。
2.有些國小老師認為目前使用的國小英語教科書缺乏音韻覺識的練習、缺乏讓學生應用字母拼讀法知識之練習、缺乏整合式的複習。
整體而言,目前國小英語教科書中字母拼讀教學內容之編排與設計符合國小英語教師的教學需求,但仍有需改進的部分,例如:字母拼讀教學內容與課本其他內容無關;缺乏讓學生應用字母拼讀閱讀生字的練習;缺乏音韻覺識的練習;缺乏複習學生學過的字母拼讀規則;或缺乏音節與重音的練習。因此,國小英語教科書應根據本研究結果修改其字母拼讀教學內容的編排設計,以符合英語教師的教學需求。
The purpose of this study was to investigate elementary school English teachers’ perspectives on phonics instruction and on the phonics teaching contents of their English textbooks. Then the findings were further compared, contrasted, and inductively analyzed in order to find out, based on elementary school English teachers’ perspectives, if the design of the phonics teaching contents of their English textbooks is consistent with their perspectives on phonics instruction.
The instruments used in this study were questionnaire survey and interviews. The participants were elementary school English teachers whose schools used the same series of English textbooks from the third grade to the sixth grade. The questionnaire respondents included 174 teachers. Among the 174 respondents, six of them who held different perspectives and were willing to be interviewed were invited as interviewees.
The results of this study indicated that, in terms of their perspectives on phonics instruction:
1. Most elementary school English teachers know that the main purpose of phonics instruction is to teach letter-sound correspondences, and that phonics instruction benefits students’ ability to spell words, recognize words, pronounce sounds, read, and memorize words.
2. Most elementary school English teachers know that phonics instruction cannot completely replace K.K phonetic symbols. Phonics should be introduced at elementary phase. However, some elementary school English teachers still cannot distinguish phonics from phonetics.
3. Most elementary school English teachers’ perspectives on how phonics should be taught are in accordance with guidelines as suggested in previous research.
4. Most elementary school English teachers think that both traditional and contemporary phonics approaches should be used when teaching phonics.
5. Most elementary school English teachers think they have sufficient understanding about phonics, but some of them still want to know more about phonological awareness and how to teach phonics.
In terms of their perspectives on the design of the phonics teaching contents of English textbooks:
1. Most elementary school English teachers think that their English textbooks provide suitable teaching sequence, review sections, appropriate keywords of letter-sound correspondences, and onset and rimes.
2. Some elementary school English teachers think their English textbooks do not provide enough phonological awareness exercises; exercises in which students can apply their phonics knowledge; and review section which integrate what studemts have learned before.
To sum up, the design of the phonics teaching contents of English textbooks in general meets elementary school English teachers’ teaching needs. However, there are still a few things that need to be improved. For example, the phonics teaching contents are irrelevant to other exercises in the textbooks; there are not enough phonological awareness exercises, syllable and stress exercises, or exercises for students to read unfamiliar words and review what they have learned. Thus, English textbooks should modify the design of the phonics teaching contents according to the findings in this study in order to meet English teachers’ teaching needs.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ...................................iii
TABLE OF CONTENTS ...................................iv
LIST OF TABLES .................................. .viii
中文摘要 .............................................x
ABSTRACT............................................xii
CHAPTER ONE INTRODUCTION ............................ 1
1.1 Background and Rationale ........................ 1
1.2 Purposes of the Study ........................... 6
1.3 Research Questions .............................. 6
1.4 Significance of the Study ....................... 7
CHAPTER TWO LITERATURE REVIEW ....................... 9
2.1 Phonics Instruction ............................. 9
2.1.1 Teaching contents of phonics ................. 10
2.1.2 Teaching approaches to phonics ............... 14
2.1.2.1 Traditional phonics approaches ............. 14
2.1.2.2 Contemporary phonics approaches ............ 15
2.1.3 The importance of phonics in reading.......... 17
2.1.4 Prerequisites of phonics instruction ......... 22
2.2 Arguments against Phonics Instruction .......... 25
2.2.1 Traditional phonics approaches often focus on the de-contextualized learning of sound-spelling connections without paying attention to meaning ................ 25
2.2.2 English letter-sound correspondences are not always regular ............................................ 28
2.2.3 The effectiveness of phonics instruction on EFL learners in Taiwan is uncertain .................... 29
2.3 Guidelines for Phonics Instruction ............. 31
2.3.1 Phonics instruction should build on letter knowledge which is taught in a logical sequence .............. 31
2.3.2 Phonics instruction should be taught along with phonemic awareness training ................. 31
2.3.3 Phonics instruction should be arranged in an appropriate sequence ............................... 32
2.3.4 Phonics instruction should provide appropriate keywords ........................................... 36
2.3.5 Phonics instruction should be combined with real reading ............................................ 37
2.3.6 Phonics instruction should introduce onsets and rimes .................................................... 38
2.4 English Teachers’ Perspectives on Phonics Instruction .................................................... 38
2.5 Studies on the Analysis of Elementary School English Textbook Contents in Taiwan ........................ 42
CHAPTER THREE METHODOLOGY .......................... 47
3.1 Research Design ................................ 47
3.2 Participants ................................... 47
3.3 Instruments .................................... 49
3.3.1 Questionnaire ................................ 49
3.3.1.1 The validity and reliability of the questionnaire .................................................... 52
3.3.2 Interview .................................... 52
3.4 Research Procedures ............................ 53
3.5 Data Analysis .................................. 55
CHAPTER FOUR RESULTS AND DISCUSSION ................ 57
4.1 Background Information about the Questionnaire Respondents and the Interviewees ................... 57
4.2 The Participants’ Perspectives on Phonics Instruction......................................... 61
4.2.1 The participants’ perspectives on what phonics instruction is about ............................... 61
4.2.2 The participants’ perspectives on the benefits of phonics instruction .................................76
4.2.3 The participants’ perspectives on the prerequisites of phonics instruction ............................. 79
4.2.4 The participants’ perspectives on the teaching sequence of phonics instruction .................... 88
4.2.5 The participants’ perspectives on how phonics should be taught .......................................... 98
4.2.6 The participants’ perspectives on their own understandings about phonics ...................... 114
4.3 The Participants’ Perspectives on the Phonics Teaching Contents of English Textbooks ..................... 119
4.3.1 The participants’ perspectives on the prerequisites for phonics instruction in their English textbooks ................................................... 119
4.3.2 The participants’ perspectives on the phonics teaching sequence in their English textbooks ...... 121
4.3.3 The participants’ perspectives on the how phonics are taught in their English textbooks ............. 122
4.4 The Degree of the Consistency Between Teachers’ Perspectives on Phonics Instruction and the Design of the Phonics Teaching Contents of English Textbooks .... 129
CHAPTER FIVE CONCLUSIONS .......................... 149
5.1 Major Findings ................................ 149
5.1.1 Elementary school English teachers’ perspectives on phonics instruction ............................... 150
5.1.2 Elementary school English teachers’ perspectives on the phonics teaching contents of their English textbooks ................................................... 152
5.1.3 The degree of consistency between elementary school English teachers’ perspectives on phonics instruction and the design of the phonics teaching contents of English textbooks ......................................... 153
5.2 Pedagogical Implications ...................... 154
5.3 Limitations and Suggestions ................... 157
REFERENCES ........................................ 159
Appendix A: First Version of Questionnaire ........ 167
Appendix B: 專家效度評定問卷 ...................... 172
Appendix C: 專家評定建議 .......................... 178
Appendix D: Formal Questionnaire .................. 180
Appendix E: Interview Guide ....................... 185
Appendix F: Results of Parallel Items in the Second Part of the Questionnaire ................................. 186
Appendix G: Results of Parallel Items in the Third Part of the Questionnaire ................................. 189
Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Albert, E. (1994). Phonics for Learning How to Read. U.S. Dept. of Education Office of Educational Research and Improvement (OERI). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 370078)

Ball, E. W., & Blachman, B. A. (1991). Does phoneme segmentation training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Reaserch Quarterly, 26, 49-66.

Baumann, J. F., Hoffman, J. V., Moon, J., & Duffy-Hester, A. M. (1998). Where are
teachers’ voices in the phonics/whole language debate? Results from a survey
of U.S. elementary classroom teachers. The Reading Teacher,51(8), 636-650.

Beck, I. L., & Juel, C. (1995). The role of decoding in learning to read. American
Educator, 19(2), 8-42.

Blevins, W. (2006). Phonics from A to Z: A practical guide (2nd ed.). New York: Scholastic.

Burke, L., Fiene, J., Young, M. J., & Meyer, D. K. (2008). Understanding the why behind the how in reading instruction. The Educational Forum, 72, 168-176.

Byrne, B., & Fielding-Barnsley, R. (1989). Phonemic awareness and letter knowledge in the child’s acquisition of the alphabetic principle. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(3), 313-321.

Cantrell, S. C. (1999). The effects of literacy instruction on primary students’ reading
and writing achievement. Reading Research and Instruction, 39(1), 3-26.

Christensen, C. A., & Bowey, J. A. (2005). The efficacy of orthographic rime,
grapheme-phoneme correspondence, and implicit phonics approaches to
teaching decoding skills. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(4), 327-349.

Chen, C. J. (2010). The analysis on adjacency pairs in EFL textbooks for elementary schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Chu, H. M. (2002). Beginning EFL learners’ decoding skill and word reading. Taipei Municipal Teachers College Journal, 33, 471-484.

Clay, M. M. (1993). Reading Recovery: A guidebook for teachers in training.
Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Connelly, V., Johnston, R., & Thompson, G. B. (2001). The effect of phonics instruction on the reading comprehension of beginning readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 423-457.

Cunningham, P. M. (2005). Phonics they use: Words for reading and writing. Boston: Pearson/ Allyn & Bacon.

Dahl, K. L., & Scharer, P. L. (2000). Phonics teaching and learning in whole language
classrooms: New evidence from research. The Reading Teacher, 53(7), 584-594.

Dahl, K. L., Scharer, P. L., Lawson, L. L., & Grogan, P. R. (2001). Rethinking phonics: Making the best teaching decision. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Ehri, L. C. (1998). Grapheme-phoneme knowledge is essential for learning to read words in English. In J. L. Metsala & L. C. Ehri (Eds.), Word recognition in beginning literacy (pp. 3-40). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Ehri, L. C. (2003). Systematic phonics instruction: Findings of the National Reading
Panel. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED479646)

Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Stahl, S. A., & Willows, D. M. (2001). Systematic phonics instruction helps students learn to read: Evidence from the National Reading Panel’s meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 71(3), 393–447.

Eldredge, J. L. (2005). Foundations of fluency: An exploration. Reading Psychology, 26, 161-181.

Eldredge, J. L., Quinn, B., & Butterfield, D. D. (1990). Causal relationships between phonics, reading comprehension, and vocabulary achievement in the second grade. Journal of Educational Research, 83(4), 201-214.

Flesch, R. (1955). Why Johnny can’t read: And what you can do about it. NY: Harper
and Brothers.

Fox, B. J. (2008). Word identification strategies: Building phonics into a classroom reading program. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson / Merrill Prentice Hall.

Gattegno, C. (1976). The common sense of teaching foreign languages. NY:
Educational Solutions.

Graves, M. F., Watts, S., & Graves, B. (1994). Essentials of classroom teaching: elementary reading method. MA: Allyn & Bacon.

Gunning, T. G. (1996). Creating reading instruction for all children (1st ed.). Boston:
Allyn & Bacon.

Gunning, T. G. (2000). Creating literacy instruction for all children (3rd ed.). Boston: Allyn & Bacon.

Han, W. Y. (2008). A study of the vocabulary size and recycling frequency in elementary school and junior high school English textbooks. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taiwan Normal University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Heilman, A. W. (1985). Phonics in proper perspective. Columbus: Merrill.

Hill, S. (1999). Phonics: Focus on literacy. Australia: Eleanor Curtain Publishing.

Hu, C. F. (2000). Some questions you may ask about phonics. Hwa Kang Journal of
Foreign Languages and Literature, 7, 161-172.

Huang, Y. C. (2008). Corpus analysis of vocabulary in English textbook for elementary schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Huang, Y. L. (2011). An analysis of the teaching activities in the teachers' guides of elementary school English textbooks. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Changhua University of Education, Changhua City, Taiwan.

Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80, 437-447.

Juel, C., Griffith, P. L., & Gough, P. B. (1986). Acquisition of literacy: A longitudinal study of children in first and second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78, 243-255.

Kolstad, R. K., & Bardwell, J. (1997). Phonics vs. whole language in the teaching of
reading. Reading Improvement, 34, 154-160.

Lapp, D., & Flood, J. (1992). Teaching reading to every child (3rd ed.). New York: Macmillian.

Lesaux, N. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2003). The development of reading in children who speak English as a second language. Developmental Psychology, 39(6), 1005-1019.

Liao, C. H. (2009). An analysis on activity design of English textbooks used in elementary schools. (Unpublished master’s thesis). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Liaw, M. L. (2003). Integrating phonics instruction and whole language principles in
an elementary school EFL classroom. English Teaching and Learning, 27(3),
15-24.

Lin, M. Y. (2002). English Phonics Instruction and Its Teaching Sequence for Elementary School Students in Taiwan (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi University, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Lin, Y. C. (2002). Phonics instruction: A study of children’s textbooks in Taiwan. Paper presented at the meeting of the 91st year educational symposium, National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei.

Lin, Y. C. (2003). Phonics Introduction: A Survey of Elementary School English
Teachers’ Beliefs and Practices (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei Teachers College, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Liu, S. J (2009). An evaluation of the current elementary english textbooks: Teachers’ perspectives. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chengchi Unversity. Taipei City. Taiwan.

Lyon, A., & Moore, P. (2003). Sound system: Explicit, systematic phonics in early
literacy context. Portland, ME: Stenhouse Publishers.

Mahar, N. E., & Richdale, A. L. (2008). Primary teachers’ linguistic knowledge and perceptions of early literacy instruction. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 13(1), 17-37.

Mason, J. M. (1980). When do children begin to read: An exploration of four year old children’s letter and word reading competencies. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(2), 203-227.

Mather, N., Bos, C., & Babur, N. (2001). Perceptions and knowledge of preservice and inservice teachers about early literacy instruction. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 34(5), 472-482.

Mesmer, H. A. E., & Griffith, P. L. (2005). Everybody’s selling it- But just what is explicit, systematic phonics instruction? The Reading Teacher, 59(4), 366-376.

The Minister of Education (MOE). (2000). The nine-year integrated curriculum
guildlines/ English.

The Minister of Education (MOE). (2008). The nine-year integrated curriculum
guildlines/ English.

Moats, L. C. (1994). The missing foundation in teacher education: Knowledge of the structure of spoken and written language. Annals of Dyslexia, 44, 81-104.

Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching
children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research
literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the
subgroups. Rockville, MD: NICHD Clearinghouse.

Osborn, J., Stahl, S. A., & Stein, M. (1997). Teacher’s guidelines for evaluating commercial phonics packages. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

Paul, D. (2003). Teaching English to children in Asia. Hong Kong: Longman.

Peregoy, S. F., & Boyle, O. F. (1993). Reading, writing, and learning in ESL: A resource book for K-8 teachers. New York: Longman Publishing Group.

Snider, V. E. (1995). A primer on phonemic awareness: what it is, why it’s important,
and how to teach it. School Psychology Review, 24(3), 443-455.

Stahl, S. A. (1992). Saying the “p” word: Nine guidelines for exemplary phonics
instruction. The Reading Teacher, 45(8), 618-625.

Stahl, S. A. (2001). Teaching phonics and phonemic awareness. In S. B. Neuman & D. K. Dickinson (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (pp. 333-347). New York: The Guilford Press.

Stahl, S. A., Duffy-Hester, A. M., & Stahl, K. A. D. (1998). Everything you wanted to know about phonics (but were afraid to ask). Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 338-355.

Stuart, M. (1999). Getting ready for reading: Early phoneme awareness and phonics teaching improves reading and spelling in inner-city second language learners. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 587-605.

Swaby, B. (1984). Teaching and learning reading. Illinois: Scott Foresman.

Texas Education Agency. (2000). Guidelines for examining phonics and word recognition programs. Austin, TX: Publications Distribution Office, Texas Education Agency.

Tseng, F. H. (2008). An analysis of vocabulary selection in elementary school English textbooks. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Chung Cheng University, Chiayi County, Taiwan.

Tseng, Y. C. (2008). An investigation of new words used in elementary English textbooks in Taipei. (Unpublished master’s thesis). National Taipei University of Education, Taipei City, Taiwan.

Wang, C. L. (2008). A study of elementary school teachers’ perspectives on phonics instruction. Studies in English Language and Literature, 22, 1-9.

Wang, Y. C. (2001). Phonics instruction vs. whole language approach in teaching
reading. Jing-e Quarterly, 13 (1), 36-42.

中文參考資料

朱惠美 (2003)。淺談字母拼讀教學。載於趙麗蓮(主編),兒童英語教學面面觀(91-126頁)。臺北:書林。

李惠鈴 (2006)。屏東縣國小英語教師對教科書使用意見之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立屏東教育大學。屏東市。

陳彥宏 (2010)。審定版國小英語教科書課文句型難易度分析(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台東大學,台東市。

陳宜敬 (2004)。嘉義縣市國小高年級英語教師使用教科書之調查研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立嘉義大學。嘉義縣。

孫蕙文 (2000)。英語科phonics教材選用規準與實際運用成效之研究(未出版之碩士論文)。國立台南師範學院,台南市。
目次
第一章
第二章
第三章
第四章
第五章
參考文獻
附錄
校內電子全文開放日期:2012.7.25
校外電子全文開放日期:2012.7.25
 
 
 
 
第一頁 上一頁 下一頁 最後一頁 top
* *