|
參考文獻 中文部分 2. 丁春蘭(2003)。國小學童乘除問題的解題表現、後設認知與認知型式之分析研究。未出版之碩士論文,國立台中師範學院數學教育研究所,台中市。 3. 古明峰(1998)。數學應用題的解題認知歷程之探討。教育研究資訊,6 (3)63-77。 4. 林清山(譯)(1997)。R.E. Mayer 著。教育心理學-認知取向。臺北:遠流。 5. 邱佳寧(2001)。國小四年級數學學習障礙學生解題策略之研究。國立彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所未出版之碩士論文。 6. 洪義德(2002)。不同表徵面積題目對國小六年級學生解題表現之探討。未出版之碩士論文,國立台北師範學院數理教育研究所,台北市。 7. 翁嘉英(1988)。國小兒童解數學應用問題的認知歷程。國立台灣大學心理學研究所碩士論文 8. 張宗育(2003)。國小六年級數學學習困難學生時間化聚問題解題之研究。彰化師範大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文(未出版)。 9. 陳文寬(2007)。加減應用問題中多餘資訊的辨識。國立政治大學心理學研究所碩士論文。 10. 陳立倫(2000)。兒童解答數學文字題的認知歷程。未出版之碩士論文,國立中正大學心理研究所。 11. 陳明彥(2002)。國小學童語言能力、閱讀理解能力與寫作表現關係之研究。國立台中教育大學諮商與教育心理研究所碩士論文,未出版,臺中市。 12. 陳倩萍(2003)。從真實情境觀點探討學生之解題表現。國立新竹師範學院數理教育碩士論文(未出版)。 13. 陳慧娟(2008)。不同能力學童擬定及執行解題計畫的差異性研究。臺北市立教育大學數學資訊教育研究所碩士論文。 14. 黃敏晃(1991)。淺談數學解題。教與學,23,2-15。 15. 塗金堂(2007)。小學生數學文字題問題結構與數學解題表現之相關研究。屏東教育大學學報,26,101-136 16. 楊坤原(1996)。認知風格與科學學習成就的關係。科學教育月刊,195,2-23。 17. 楊雅捷(2002)。語言表徵在數學解題上扮演的角色。國教天地,150, 40-46。 18. 楊瑞智(1994)。國小五六年級不同能力學童數學解題的思考過程。國立台灣師範大學科學教育研究所博士論文。 19. 葉建成(2008)。國小六年級學生數學科主動學習使用認知策略與後設認知策略之研究。國立高雄師範大學數學研究所碩士論文。 20. 葉雪梅(1990)。國小兒童對「比較」類應用問題的解題行為。國立政治大學教育研究所碩士論文。 21. 劉信雄(1992)。國小學生認知風格、學習策略、自我效能、與學業成就關係之研究。國立政治大學教育研究所博士論文。 22. 蔡佳苓(2006)。數學低成就學生以不同讀題方式解數學應用題之差異研究─以多餘訊息及二步驟題型為例。國立臺南大學特殊教育研究所碩士論文。 23. 蔣治邦(1993)。中年級學童解決加減文字題能力之探討:多餘資訊與兩步驟問題。科學教育學刊,1(2),189-212 24. 閰育蘇(譯)(1990)。怎樣解題。台北市: 九章。 英文部分 25. Ashman, A.F. & Conway, R.N.F.(1993).Using cognitive methods in the classroom. New York: Routledge. 26. Babbitt, B. C. (1990, October). Error patterns in problem solving. Paper presented at the International Conference of the Council for Learning Disabilities, Austin,TX. 27. Briars,D.J.,&Larkin,J.H.(1984).An integrated model of skill in solving elementary word problems.Cognition and Instruction,1,245-296. 28. Blankenship, C. S., & Lovitt, T. C. (1976). Story problems: Merely confusing or downright befuddling. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 7,290-298. 29. Cummins,D.D.(1991).Children’sinterpretations of arithmetic word problems.Cognitionand Instruction,8,261-289. 30. De Corte,E. & Verschaffel, L.(1993).Some factors influencing the solution of addition and subtraction word problems. In K.Durkin & B.Shire(Eds.),Language in mathematical education:Research and practice. 117-130 PA:Bristol 31. Dewey,J. (1933). How we think:a restatement of the relation of reflective thinking to the educative process. Lexington:D.C.Heath. 32. Fuson,K.C.(1992).Research on whole numble addition and subtraction.Un D.A.Grouws(Ed.),Handbook of research on mathmatics teaching and learning.New York:Macmilian. 33. Gagn'e, E. D., Yekovich, C.W., &Yekovich, F. R. (1993). The cognitivepsychology of school learning (2nd ed.). New York, NY:HarperCollins College Publishers. 34. Krutetskii, V.A. (1976). The Psychology of Mathematical Abilities in Schoolchildren (J.Kilpatric & I. Wirszup, Trans.). The University of Chicago Press. 35. Larkin, J.H. (1983). The role of problem representation in Physics. In D. Gentner & A. L. Stevens (Eds.), Mental models (pp. 75-98). Hillsdale, NJL: Lawrence Erlbaum. 36. Lesh, R., & Landau, M.(1983). conceptual models and applied mathematic problem-solving research. IN R. Lesh & M. Landau (Ed.).Acquisition of mathematics concepts and processes (pp.263-343). New York:Academic. 37. Lester, K.F. (1980). Reasearch on mathematical ploblem solving. In R.J. Shumway(ed.), Research in mathematics education . The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. 38. Lin, P. J. (1998). A study of children’s comprehension processes by using “Retelling aftersolving” Technique. 新竹師院學報,11,187-227. 39. Littlefield, J., & Rieser, J. J. (1993). Semantic features of similarity and children’s strategies for identifying relevant information in mathematical story problems.Cognition and instruction, 11,133-188. 40. Marshall,S.P.,Pribe,C.A.,&Smith,J.D.(1987).Schema Knowledge structure for representing and understanding arithemetic story problems.(Tech.Rep.ontract No.n00017-85-k-0661)Arilington,VA:Office of Naval Research. 41. Mayer, R. E. (1987). Educational Psychology : A Cognitive Approach, Boston:Little,Brown and Company 42. Mayer, R. E. (1992). Thinking,problem solving,cognition.New York:Freeman. 43. Mayer, R. E. (1992a).Cognition and instruction:Their historic meeting within educational psychology.Journal of educational psychology.Vol. 84. No. 4. 405-412. 44. Muth, K. D. (1992). Extraneous information and extra steps in arithmetic word problems. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 17, 278-285. 45. Passolunghi, M. C., Cornoldi, C., & De Liberto, S. (1999). Working memory and intrusions of irrelevant information in a group of specific poor problem solvers.Memory and Cognition, 27, 779-790. 46. Passolunghi, M. C., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Short-term memory, working memory and inhibitory control in children with difficulties in arithmetic problem solving.Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 44-57. 47. Polya, G. (1945). How To Solve It. Princeton, New Jersey : Princeton University Press. 48. Quintero, A. H. (1983). Conceptual understanding in solving two-step word problems with a ratio. Journal for Research in Mathematic Education, 14(2), 102-112. 49. Riley, M. S., Greeno, J. G., & Heller, J. I.( 1983) .Development of children' s problem - solving ability inarithmetics. In H. P. Ginsburg( Ed.) , The developmentof mathematical thinking( pp.153 - 196) . New York:Academic Press. 50. Robinson, C. S. & Hayes, J. R. (1978).Mathematical reasoning: Making inferences about relevance in understanding problems. In R. Revlin & R. E. Mayer(Eds.). Human reasoning (pp.195-206) New York: John,Wiley,&Sons. 51. Schoenfeld, A. H. (1985). Mathematical Problem Solving. London:AcademicPress. 52. Stewart. J. and Atkin, J. A. (1982), Information Processing Psychology: A Promising Paradigm for Research. in Science Teaching., Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 19(4), 321-332. 53. Verschaffel, L.,De Corte, E.,Pauwels, A.(1992). Solving compare problems: An eye movement test of Lewis and Mayer's consistency hypothesis.Journal of Educational Psychology,84,85-94.
|