|
一、中文文獻
王梅軒（2003）。國小課程本位閱讀測量之信度與效度研究。台北市立教育大學身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
王梅軒、黃瑞珍（2005）。國小課程本位閱讀測量方法之信度與效度。特殊教育研究學刊，29，73-94。
甘耀樺（2003）。閱讀障礙學童與一般學童閱讀速度之比較研究。
台東大學教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台東市。
林素貞（2004）。國小課程本位閱讀測量方法之信度與效度。國小一年級國語文課程本位測量不同版本朗讀測驗之比較研究。特殊教育學報，20，1-24。
林素貞（2005）。國民小學低年級國語文課程本位測量之編製報告。特殊教育研究學刊，28，75-96。
林寶貴、錡寶香（1992）。中文閱讀理解測驗。教育部。
柯華葳（1998）。閱讀理解困難篩選測驗施測說明。台北：行政
院國家科學委員會特殊教育工作小組。
洪碧霞、邱上真（1999）。國民中小學國語文成就測驗。教育部。
洪月女譯（1998）。談閱讀（譯自Kenneth S.Goodman）。台北，遠
流。
陳惠琴、楊憲明（2008）。國小學童文本朗讀速度之分析研究。特
殊教育與復健學報，18，1-30。
曾世杰，邱上真，林彥同（2003）。幼稚園至國小三年級學童各
類唸名速度能力之研究。師大學報，48（2），261-290。
葉靖雲（1994）。課程本位閱讀測驗的效度研究。特殊教育與復
健學報，6，239-260。
葉靖雲（1998）。課程本位中、英文閱讀與英文書寫表達測驗的
效度研究。特殊教育學報，9，257-287。
蕭素禎（2007）。課程本位閱讀測量對國小四年級閱讀障礙兒童閱讀成效監控模式之研究。台北市立教育大學身心障礙教育研究所碩士論文，未出版，台北市。
二、英文文獻
Allinder, R. M. (1995). An examination of the relationship between teacher efficacy and curriculum-based measurement and student achievement. Remedial and Special Education, 16, 247-254.
Alonzo, J., & Tindal, G. (2004). Analysis of Reading Fluency and Comprehesion Measures for Sixth-Grade Students. (Tech. Rep. No. 24). Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon, College of Education, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
Canter, A., & Marston, D. (1998). Curriculum–based measurement: A handout for teachers. In A. S. Cantor & S. A. Carroll (Eds.), Helping Children at Home and School: Handouts from Your School Psychologist . Bethesda, MD: National Association of School Psychologists.
Chard, D. J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B. J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learing disabilities. Journal of Learing Disabilities, 35, 386-406.
Deno, S. L., Mirkin, P. K., & Chang, B（1982）. Identifying valid measures of reading. Exceptional Children, 49(1), 36-45.
Deno, S. L., Marston, D., Shinn, M., & Tindal, G.（1983）. Oral reading fluency: A simple datum for scaling reading disability. Topics in Learning & Learning Disabilities, 2(4), 53-59.
Deno, S. L.（1985）.Curriculum-based measurement: The emerging alternatives. Exceptional Children, 52(3), 219-232.
Beghetto, R., & Tindal, G. (2004). Analysis of Reading Fluency and Comprehesion Measures for Fifth-Grade Students. (Tech. Rep. No. 28). Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon, College of Education, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
Breznitz, Z. (1987). Increasing First Graders' Reading Accuracy and Comprehension by Accelerating Their Reading Rates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 236-242.
Deno, S. L., & Fuchs, L. S.（1987）. Developing curriculum-based measurement systems for data-based special education problem solving. Focus on Exceptional Children, 19(8), 1-16.
Deno, S. L.（1987）. Curriculum-Based Measurement, Program Development, Graphing Performance and Increasing Efficiency, Teaching Exceptional Children, 20, 41-47.
Deno, S. L.（2003）Curriculum-Based Measures: Development and Perspectives.Assessment for Effective Intervention, 28, 3, 3-12.
Dowhower, S. L. (1987). Effects of Repeated Reading on Second-Grade Transitional Readers' Fluency and Comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 22, 389-406.
Dunn, E. K. & Eckert, T. L.（2002）. Curriculum-based measurement in reading: A comparison of similar versus challenging material. School Psychology Quarterly, 17(1), 24-34.
Ehri, L. C., & McCormick, S. (1998). Phases of Word Learning: Implications for Instruction with Delayed and Disabled Readers. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties,14, 135-164.
Fawcett, A. J. , & Nicolson, R. I. (1994). Naming speed in children with dyslexia. Journal of Learing Disabilities, 27, 641-646.
Fewster, S. & MacMillan, P. D.(2002). School-based evidence for the validity of curriculum-based measurement of reading and writing. Remedial and Special Education, 23(3), 149-156.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Deno, S. L. (1982). Reliability and validity of curriculum-based informal reading inventories. Reading Research Quarterly, 18, 6-26.
Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L, & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). The effects of frequent curriculum-bid measurement and evaluation on student achievement, pedagogy, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
Fuchs, L. S. , & Fuchs, D. (1986b). Curriculum-based assessment of progress toward long- and short-term goals. Journal of Special Education, 20, 69-82.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Maxwell, L. (1988). The validity of informal reading comprehension measures. Remedial and Special Education, 9(2), 20-29.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Stecker, P. M. (1989). Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers' instructional planning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 51-59.
Fuchs, L. S., & Fuchs, D. (1990). Relations among the reading comprehensionsubtestsof the Stanford Achievement Test and maze, recall, Question-answering, and fluency measures.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M. K., & Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading , 5 , 239-256.
Good, R. H. III, Simmons, D. C., & Kameenui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257-288.
Harris, T. L.& Hodges, R. E. (1995). The Literacy Dictionary. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Hintze, J. M ., Owen, S. V. , Shapiro, E.J. & DalyIII, E. J. (2000). Generalizability of oral reading fluency measures: Application of G theory to curriculum-based measurement. School Psychology Quarterly, 15(1), 52-63.
Hudson, R. F., Lane, H. B., & Pullen, P.C. (2005). Reading fluency assessment and instruction: What, why, and how. TheReading Teacher, 58 (8), 702-714.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Hamlett, C. L. (1989a). Effects of alternative goal structures within curriculum-based measurement. Exceptional Children, 55, 429-438.
Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., & Stecker, P. M. (1989). Effects of curriculum-based measurement on teachers' instructional planning. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 22, 51-59.
Ketterlin-Geller, L. R., & Tindal, G. (2004). Analysis of Reading Fluency and Comprehesion Measures for 3rd-Grade Students. (Tech. Rep. No. 22). Eugene, Oregon: University of Oregon, College of Education, Behavioral Research and Teaching.
Kuhn, M. R., & Stahl, S. A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. (1974). Toward a Theory of Automatic Information Processing in Reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.
Wood, David E. (2006). Modeling the Relationship between Oral Reading Fluency and Performance on a Statewide Reading Test. Educational Assessment, 11, 85-104.
Wright, J. (1999). Curriculum-based measurement: Awe manual for teachers. Syracuse city schools: NJ
Wright, J. (1992). Curriculum-Based Measurement: A Manual for Teachers. School Psychologist Syracuse City Schools.
Ysseldyke, J. E., & Marston, D. (1982). A critical analysis
of standardized reading test. School Psychology Review,
11, 257-266.
Marston, D. (1989). Curriculum-based measurement: What is it and why do it? In M. R. Shinn (Ed.), Curriculum based measurement:Assessing special children (pp. 18-78). New York: Guilford.
Rasinski, T. V. (1989). Fluency for everyone: Incorporating
fluency instruction inthe classroom. The Reading
Teacher, 42(9), 690–693.
Rasinski, T. V., & Hoffman, T. V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 510–522.
Rasinski, T. V. (2006). Fluency: An Oft-Neglected Goal of the Reading Program. In C. Cummins (Ed.), Understanding and Implementing Reading First Initiatives (pp. 60-71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Shapiro, E. S. (1996). Academic skills problems: Direct assessment and intervention. New York: Guilford Press.
Shinn, M. R. (1989). Curriculum–based measurement: Assessing special children. New York: Guilford Press.
Shinn, M. R., Good, R. H., Knutson, N. , Tilly, W. D., & Collins, V. L. (1992). Curriculum-based measurement of oral reading fluency: A confirmatory analysis of its relations to reading. School Psychology Review, 21, 459-479.
U. S Department of Education (2006) . Identification of Specific Learning Disabilities. http://www.ed.gov/index.jhtml.
Whit, O. R., & Haring, N. G. (1980). Exceptional teaching (2nd ed.). Columbus, OH: Merrill.
Shinn, M. R. (1995). Best practices in curriculum-based measurement and its use in a problem-solving model. In A. Thomas & J. Grimes (Eds.). Best practices in school psychology-Ⅲ (pp. 587-595). Washington, D.C.: National Association of
School Psychologists.
National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implication for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.
National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching Children to Read (Report of the Subgroups) U. S. Department of Health and Human Services.
Pikulski, J. J., & Chard, D. J. (2005). Fluency: Bridge
Between Decoding and Reading Comprehension. The Reading
Teacher, 58(6), 510–519.
Shinn, M. R. (1998). Advanced applications of curriculum-based measurement. New York: Guilford.
Sibley, D., Biwer, D., & Hesch, A. (2001). Establishing Curriculum-Based Measurement Oral Reading Fluency Performance Standards to Predict Success on Local and State Tests of Reading Achievement.
Sibley, D., Biwer, D., & Hesch, A. (2001). Unpublished Data. Arlington Heights, IL: AHSD 25.
Spear-Swerling, Louise. (2006). Children's Reading Comprehension and Oral Reading Fluency in Easy Text. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 199-220.
|